Dodge Grand Caravan 2011 vs Hyundai H1 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Dodge Grand Caravan) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Hyundai H1) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 287 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Grand Caravan engine produces 171 HP more power than Hyundai H1, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Hyundai H1. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 8.3 | |
|
The Hyundai H1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Grand Caravan consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Grand Caravan could require 525 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai H1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Dodge Grand Caravan) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.15 m | 5.13 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.93 m | |
|
Dodge Grand Caravan is larger, but lower. Dodge Grand Caravan is 3 cm longer than the Hyundai H1, 8 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Grand Caravan is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 2359 litres | 851 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 2359 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 851 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
4072 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Grand Caravan is 0.7 metres more than that of the Hyundai H1, which means Dodge Grand Caravan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`744 kg | 3`030 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`050 kg | 2`175 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 694 kg | 855 kg | |
| Dodge Grand Caravan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than Hyundai H1. Therefore, Hyundai H1 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Grand Caravan has
|
Hyundai H1 has
| |