Dodge Grand Caravan 1996 vs Chrysler Voyager 1999
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 158 HP | 114 HP | |
Torque: | 275 NM | 262 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
Dodge Grand Caravan engine produces 44 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Grand Caravan engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Chrysler Concorde | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Grand Caravan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.07 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Dodge Grand Caravan is 34 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 670 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`685 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Grand Caravan has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |