Dodge Grand Caravan 2001 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 215 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 332 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
| Dodge Grand Caravan engine produces 37 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 14.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 76 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Dodge Grand Caravan is larger. Dodge Grand Caravan is 3 cm longer than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 8 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Grand Caravan is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 670 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4880 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Grand Caravan has 90 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. This could mean that the Dodge Grand Caravan uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Grand Caravan has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |