Dodge Grand Caravan 1996 vs Chevrolet Astro 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Dodge Grand Caravan is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Astro can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 | 4.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 142 - 166 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 - 308 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 12.5 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.90 m | |
| Dodge Grand Caravan is 25 cm longer than the Chevrolet Astro, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Grand Caravan is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 670 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4825 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Astro has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Grand Caravan has 500 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Astro. This could mean that the Dodge Grand Caravan uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`727 | ~ 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Grand Caravan has
|
Chevrolet Astro has
| |