Dodge Grand Caravan 2008 vs Toyota Sienna 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.3 - 4.0 | 3.3 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 - 253 HP | 215 - 266 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 - 262 NM | 301 - 344 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 - 12.4 | 10.7 - 13.0 | |
|
Dodge Grand Caravan petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Sienna. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Grand Caravan is 3 cm shorter than the Toyota Sienna, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 2350 litres | 1235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
4086 litres | 4217 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Toyota Sienna may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Sienna (by 131 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`775 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Grand Caravan has
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |