Dodge Durango 1998 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.9 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 21 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 13.1 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 211 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 30 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | 2047 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Dodge Durango has 572 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Dodge Durango uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 435 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 2`427 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |