Dodge Durango 1998 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.9 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 382 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 68 HP less power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 77 NM less than Toyota 4-Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 12.6 | |
|
The Toyota 4-Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
| Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 231 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota 4-Runner can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 11 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2482 litres | 2050 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Dodge Durango uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 432 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`903 kg | 2`440 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`075 kg | 1`941 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 828 kg | 499 kg | |
| Dodge Durango load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 40 procentiem more than Toyota 4-Runner. Therefore, Dodge Durango is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |