Dodge Durango 1998 vs Ford Explorer 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.9 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 212 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 344 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 35 HP less power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Ford Explorer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 13.0 | |
|
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 9 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 391 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2482 litres | no data | |
|
Dodge Durango has more luggage capacity. Dodge Durango has 141 litres more trunk space than the Ford Explorer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`903 kg | 2`595 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |