Dodge Durango 1998 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.9 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 16 HP less power than Chevrolet Blazer, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Chevrolet Blazer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 13.6 | |
| Dodge Durango consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Blazer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Dodge Durango is larger. Dodge Durango is 27 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, width is practically the same , while the height of Dodge Durango is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 1056 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | 2098 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Dodge Durango has 524 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. This could mean that the Dodge Durango uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 384 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |