Dodge Durango 2000 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 238 HP | 258 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 425 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
Dodge Durango engine produces 20 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | 16.5 | |
Dodge Durango consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 78 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
680 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.91 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
Dodge Durango is 30 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 1104 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | 2047 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Dodge Durango has 572 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Dodge Durango uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 435 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`744 | 2`495 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 3400 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |