Dodge Durango 2000 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 3 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, but torque is 34 NM less than Toyota 4-Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | 13.5 | |
|
The Toyota 4-Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 226 mm (8.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota 4-Runner can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Toyota 4-Runner version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Toyota 4-Runner 2003 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 11 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2482 litres | 2050 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Dodge Durango uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 432 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`744 kg | 2`382 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`015 kg | 1`885 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 729 kg | 497 kg | |
| Dodge Durango load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 32 procentiem more than Toyota 4-Runner. Therefore, Dodge Durango is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |