Dodge Durango 2000 vs Nissan Patrol 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 7 HP less power than Nissan Patrol, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | 18.2 | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Dodge Durango is smaller. Dodge Durango is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 8 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 183 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 183 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | 2287 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 195 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`744 | 3`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |