Dodge Durango 2000 vs Ford Explorer 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 242 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 382 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 4 HP less power than Ford Explorer, but torque is 18 NM more than Ford Explorer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | 14.6 | |
| Dodge Durango consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 9 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 391 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2482 litres | no data | |
|
Dodge Durango has more luggage capacity. Dodge Durango has 141 litres more trunk space than the Ford Explorer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`744 kg | 2`595 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
| |