Dodge Durango 2000 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 282 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 44 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Despite less power, Dodge Durango reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.4 | 16.2 | |
| Dodge Durango consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Dodge Durango is smaller. Dodge Durango is 4 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2482 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`903 kg | 3`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |