Dodge Durango 2000 vs Ford Explorer 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 242 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 382 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Ford Explorer is a more dynamic driving. Dodge Durango engine produces 4 HP less power than Ford Explorer, but torque is 18 NM more than Ford Explorer. Due to the lower power, Dodge Durango reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.4 | 14.6 | |
|
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 9 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 391 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2482 litres | no data | |
|
Dodge Durango has more luggage capacity. Dodge Durango has 144 litres more trunk space than the Ford Explorer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`903 kg | 2`595 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |