Dodge Durango 2000 vs Dodge Durango 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 393 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Durango 2000 and Dodge Durango 2004 have the same engine power, but Dodge Durango 2000 torque is 7 NM more than Dodge Durango 2004. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.4 | 14.6 | |
|
The Dodge Durango 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango 2000 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango 2000 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Dodge Durango 2000 is smaller. Dodge Durango 2000 is 19 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango 2004, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango 2000 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | no data | |
| Dodge Durango 2000 has 3 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Durango 2004. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 2`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |