Dodge Durango 1998 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.9 Petrol | 5.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 273 HP | |
| Torque: | 454 NM | 427 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 23 HP less power than Chevrolet Tahoe, but torque is 27 NM more than Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 19.2 | 15.4 | |
|
The Chevrolet Tahoe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 570 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 98 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 490 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Tahoe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Tahoe can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 700'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Tahoe engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Express, Chevrolet Suburban | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Dodge Durango is smaller. Dodge Durango is 14 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Tahoe, 25 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2482 litres | 2920 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Dodge Durango has 72 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Tahoe. The Chevrolet Tahoe may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 438 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 3`084 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |