Dodge Durango 2013 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 364 HP | 381 HP | |
| Torque: | 529 NM | 544 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 17 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 15.0 | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | 226 mm (8.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Land Cruiser can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 840'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge RAM, Dodge Charger | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Durango might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 16 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | 2313 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 97 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Durango is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Dodge Durango can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`221 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 200 | 31 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |