Dodge Durango 2013 vs Lexus LX 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 364 HP | 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 529 NM | 530 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 3 HP less power than Lexus LX, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Lexus LX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 14.4 | |
| Dodge Durango consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LX, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | 225 mm (8.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Lexus LX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 840'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus LX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge RAM, Dodge Charger | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Durango might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.91 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 5 cm longer than the Lexus LX, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 8 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 701 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 701 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | 1267 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 1143 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Durango is 0.3 metres more than that of the Lexus LX. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`221 | 3`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Lexus LX has
| |