Dodge Durango 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 329 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 44 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 13.5 | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Dodge Durango is larger, but lower. Dodge Durango is 21 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 5 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Durango is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 663 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 663 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 2`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |