Dodge Durango 2013 vs Mazda CX-9 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 273 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 21 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, but torque is 14 NM less than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 11.3 | |
| Dodge Durango consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda CX-9) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Dodge Durango) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.73 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 1 cm longer than the Mazda CX-9, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | 2852 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Dodge Durango has more luggage space (by 3 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 442 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
| |