Dodge Durango 2013 vs Mazda CX-9 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 17 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, but torque is 14 NM less than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 11.3 | |
| Dodge Durango consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-9 2012: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Durango engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler 300C, Jeep Wrangler | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Durango might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Dodge Durango engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.73 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 1 cm longer than the Mazda CX-9, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | 2852 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Dodge Durango has more luggage space (by 3 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 442 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 2`712 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |