Dodge Durango 2013 vs Dodge Avenger 2007
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 232 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 59 HP more power than Dodge Avenger, whereas torque is 121 NM more than Dodge Avenger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 65 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Dodge Avenger) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Dodge Durango) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Dodge Durango is larger. Dodge Durango is 26 cm longer than the Dodge Avenger, 7 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Durango is 31 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Dodge Avenger has
| |