Dodge Durango 2013 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 69 HP more power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 117 NM less than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 5.8 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 5.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 810 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 16 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | 1886 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Dodge Durango has more luggage space (by 240 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 524 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Durango is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Dodge Durango can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 400 | 27 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |