Dodge Durango 2013 vs Volvo XC90 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Dodge Durango) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo XC90) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 59 HP more power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 127 NM less than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 7.7 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 525 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Durango engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Durango might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Dodge Durango engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 16 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 368 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Durango is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Dodge Durango can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 800 | 47 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |