Dodge Durango 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
Petrol engines (Dodge Durango) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 294 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 353 NM | 373 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14 seconds | |
Dodge Durango engine produces 124 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 20 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 10.6 | |
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 90 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.11 m | 4.90 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
Dodge Durango is larger, but lower. Dodge Durango is 21 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 4 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Durango is 7 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 215 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | 1790 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 620 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Dodge Durango is 1.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Dodge Durango can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 3`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 26 600 | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |