Dodge Durango 2013 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 4.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Dodge Durango) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 45 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 297 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.5 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Used also on Lexus LX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Dodge Durango engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.96 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 16 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Durango is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Dodge Durango can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`948 kg | 3`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`184 kg | 2`640 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 764 kg | 710 kg | |
| Dodge Durango load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 7 procentiem more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Therefore, Dodge Durango is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 54 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |