Dodge Durango 2013 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 158 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Durango engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler 300C, Jeep Wrangler | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Dodge Durango engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 8 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi L 200, 17 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Durango is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Durango is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Dodge Durango can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 400 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |