Dodge Durango 2013 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 625 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 216 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 272 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 13.8 | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Durango engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler 300C, Jeep Wrangler | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Jaguar XJ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Durango might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Dodge Durango engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 11 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | 2030 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 380 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Durango is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 3`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 400 | 51 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |