Dodge Durango 2013 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 4.4 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Dodge Durango) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 339 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 45 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 347 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 8.7 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Durango might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 11 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | 2030 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 380 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Durango is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 200 | 47 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |