Dodge Durango 2013 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Dodge Durango) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 45 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, but torque is 147 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 6.9 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 645 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | 297 mm (11.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 11 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 639 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 639 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2410 litres | 1943 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 467 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Durango is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`948 kg | 3`100 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`184 kg | 2`253 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 764 kg | 847 kg | |
| Dodge Durango load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 94 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |