Dodge Durango 2013 vs Land Rover Discovery 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Dodge Durango) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Discovery) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 36 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, but torque is 247 NM less than Land Rover Discovery. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 7.5 | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 555 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
| Ground clearance: | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Discovery can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Durango engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Durango might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 14 cm longer than the Land Rover Discovery, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 258 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 258 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | 2406 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 4 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Durango is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |