Dodge Durango 2013 vs Ford Explorer 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 290 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 4 HP more power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Ford Explorer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 12.4 | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | |
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 9 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 595 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | 595 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2410 litres | 2313 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Ford Explorer has more luggage space (by 105 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 97 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`948 kg | 3`225 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`184 kg | 2`102 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 764 kg | 1`123 kg | |
| Dodge Durango load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 47 procentiem less than Ford Explorer. Therefore, Ford Explorer is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |