Dodge Durango 2013 vs Ford Explorer 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 345 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 475 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 51 HP less power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 122 NM less than Ford Explorer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 12.3 | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 9 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 595 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 595 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 400 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |