Dodge Durango 2013 vs Ford Explorer 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 294 HP | 249 HP | |
Torque: | 353 NM | 345 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
Dodge Durango engine produces 45 HP more power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Ford Explorer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 11.0 | |
Dodge Durango consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.11 m | 5.01 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 2.00 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Dodge Durango is 10 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 595 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 595 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 27 200 | 12 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |