Dodge Durango 2013 vs BMW X7 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 46 HP less power than BMW X7, whereas torque is 97 NM less than BMW X7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.0 | |
|
The BMW X7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW X7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | 221 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X7 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Durango engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine BMW X7 2018 3.0 engine: The B58 engine, compared to its predecessor, features a 20% increase in boost pressure, a closed-deck cylinder block design, an increased compression ratio of 11.0:1, and a slightly larger displacement of 2998 cc, up from 2979 cc, with an additional weight of 8 kg. Despite its advancements, the engine has several common ... More about BMW X7 2018 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Dodge Durango is smaller. Dodge Durango is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X7, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 326 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 326 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | 2120 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 290 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Durango is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW X7, which means Dodge Durango can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 3`155 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 75 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
BMW X7 has
| |