Dodge Durango 2013 vs Audi Q7 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 333 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 39 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 87 NM less than Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 8.1 | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Durango engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Durango might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine Audi Q7 2015 3.0 engine: The introduction of new cast-iron cylinder liners has nearly eliminated the issue of cylinder scoring. However, catalytic converters remain highly susceptible to damage from low-quality fuel and continue to ... More about Audi Q7 2015 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 11 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 770 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | 770 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | 1955 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Audi Q7 has more luggage space (by 280 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 455 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Durango is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi Q7. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 2`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | 32 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |