Dodge Durango 2013 vs Audi Q7 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 14 HP more power than Audi Q7, but torque is 7 NM less than Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 12.1 | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler 300C, Jeep Wrangler | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Durango might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 2 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | 2035 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 375 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Durango is 0.5 metres more than that of the Audi Q7, which means Dodge Durango can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 3`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 32 400 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |