Dodge Durango 2013 vs Audi Q7 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Dodge Durango) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Audi Q7) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 54 HP more power than Audi Q7, but torque is 197 NM less than Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.1 | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 2 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2410 litres | 2035 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 375 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Durango is 0.5 metres more than that of the Audi Q7, which means Dodge Durango can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 600 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |