Dodge Durango 2013 vs Audi Q7 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Dodge Durango) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Audi Q7) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 63 HP more power than Audi Q7, but torque is 147 NM less than Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 8.5 | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 5 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 740 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 490 litres | 740 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2410 litres | 1925 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Audi Q7 has more luggage space (by 250 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 485 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`948 kg | 2`830 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`184 kg | 2`165 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 764 kg | 665 kg | |
| Dodge Durango load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Audi Q7. Therefore, Dodge Durango is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 45 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |