Dodge Durango 2004 vs Mercedes GL 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 349 HP | 340 HP | |
Torque: | 509 NM | 460 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
Dodge Durango engine produces 9 HP more power than Mercedes GL, whereas torque is 49 NM more than Mercedes GL. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 13.3 | |
The Mercedes GL is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GL, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.10 m | 5.09 m | |
Width: | 1.93 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
Dodge Durango is larger. Dodge Durango is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes GL, 1 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Durango is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 620 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2300 litres | |
Mercedes GL has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Durango has 88 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes GL. This could mean that the Dodge Durango uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`995 | 3`150 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6400 | 12 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Mercedes GL has
| |