Dodge Durango 2004 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 4.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 349 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 509 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 145 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 79 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 12.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.0 l/100km | 13.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dodge Durango consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Durango consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 21 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`995 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |