Dodge Durango 2004 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002

 
Dodge Durango
2004 - 2008
Toyota Land Cruiser
2002 - 2007
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 5.7 Petrol4.2 Diesel
Petrol engines (Dodge Durango) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.

Performance

Power: 349 HP204 HP
Torque: 509 NM430 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds13.1 seconds
Dodge Durango engine produces 145 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 79 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 14.612.6
Real fuel consumption: 14.0 l/100km13.8 l/100km
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Dodge Durango consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 300 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Durango consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.10 m4.89 m
Width: 1.93 m1.94 m
Height: 1.89 m1.89 m
Dodge Durango is 21 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 532 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data11.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`9953`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 64009400
Pros and Cons: Dodge Durango has
  • more power
  • lower price
Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv