Dodge Durango 2004 vs Nissan Murano 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 349 HP | 248 HP | |
| Torque: | 509 NM | 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 101 HP more power than Nissan Murano, whereas torque is 176 NM more than Nissan Murano. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 10.6 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 600 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Dodge Durango is larger. Dodge Durango is 34 cm longer than the Nissan Murano, 5 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Durango is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 923 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2005 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Dodge Durango uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`995 kg | 2`204 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |