Dodge Durango 2004 vs Mazda CX-9 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 349 HP | 263 HP | |
| Torque: | 509 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 86 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 12.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-9 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.73 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 3 cm longer than the Mazda CX-9, width is practically the same , while the height of Dodge Durango is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2852 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`995 | 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |