Dodge Durango 2004 vs Lexus LX 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 349 HP | 234 HP | |
| Torque: | 509 NM | 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 115 HP more power than Lexus LX, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Lexus LX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 16.0 | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LX, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Lexus LX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 21 cm longer than the Lexus LX, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2510 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Dodge Durango has 9 litres less trunk space than the Lexus LX. This could mean that the Dodge Durango uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`995 | 3`112 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Lexus LX has
| |