Dodge Durango 2004 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 349 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 509 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 206 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 179 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.0 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dodge Durango consumes 5.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 855 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Durango consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Dodge Durango is larger. Dodge Durango is 3 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 22 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Durango is 27 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 1500 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Durango has 968 litres less trunk space than the Ford Ranger. This could mean that the Dodge Durango uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`995 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |