Dodge Durango 2004 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 349 HP | 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 509 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 96 HP more power than Chrysler Pacifica, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Chrysler Pacifica. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 11.3 | |
|
The Chrysler Pacifica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Pacifica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.69 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 5 cm longer than the Chrysler Pacifica, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 369 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 369 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`995 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Chrysler Pacifica has
| |