Dodge Durango 2004 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 1999
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 6.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 349 HP | 305 HP | |
Torque: | 509 NM | 481 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Dodge Durango engine produces 44 HP more power than Chevrolet Tahoe, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 15.7 | |
Dodge Durango consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means that by driving the Dodge Durango over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Tahoe can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Chevrolet Tahoe version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Chevrolet Tahoe 1999 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.10 m | 5.05 m | |
Width: | 1.93 m | 2.00 m | |
Height: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
Dodge Durango is 5 cm longer than the Chevrolet Tahoe, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2920 litres | |
Dodge Durango has more luggage capacity. Dodge Durango has 72 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`995 | 3`085 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6400 | 6800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |