Dodge Durango 2004 vs Audi Q7 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 349 HP | 500 HP | |
| Torque: | 509 NM | 1000 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 151 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 491 NM less than Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 11.9 | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Durango consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.18 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.74 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 4 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 25 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`995 | 3`405 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Durango has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |