Dodge Durango 2004 vs Audi Q7 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 349 HP | 350 HP | |
| Torque: | 509 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
| Dodge Durango engine produces 1 HP less power than Audi Q7, but torque is 69 NM more than Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 13.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.0 l/100km | 16.1 l/100km | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Dodge Durango consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Durango could require 150 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dodge Durango consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.74 m | |
| Dodge Durango is 1 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Durango is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`995 | 2`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 6200 | |